The Myth of "Laziness": Why We Need to Rethink Work in Modern Britain
- David Hitchen
- Mar 20
- 3 min read

For far too long, the Conservative Party perpetuated a myth about people who don’t work; that they’re lazy, that they simply want to sit at home and sponge off the system. The Tory narrative insisted that the "glory days" of a work-obsessed, no-benefits society were better. But let’s get something straight: that’s not the issue. The real question is not why people are choosing not to work but why so many people find work today to be so soul-sucking and unrewarding that they’d rather do anything else.
The right-wing love to draw neat, simplistic cause-and-effect scenarios to make their point. They want to believe that people who don’t work are just choosing not to, as if it's that simple. They insist that benefits should be slashed or made harder to access, as if the mere act of withholding help will somehow magically make people eager to get back to the miserable, degrading jobs they know await them.
But the reality is far more complex, and the solution lies not in penalising those in need, but in addressing the root causes of why people have disengaged from the workforce in the first place.
Let’s talk about the economy for a moment. Over the last few decades, the British job market has transformed into a low-skilled, monotonous landscape. There’s an overabundance of unskilled work that offers little opportunity for personal development, no sense of purpose, and certainly no decent wage.
The Tories - and now even Labour under Starmer - love to bleat on about people "not pulling their weight," but how can anyone be expected to find motivation in jobs that are little more than drudgery? Human beings are not machines, but the current economy treats workers as such. You wake up, go to a soul-crushing, monotonous job, and come home drained, only to do it all over again the next day. It’s no surprise that some people would rather stay at home watching TV, not because it’s ideal, but because it’s at least an escape from the misery of modern work.
The fact is, people want to enjoy their lives, and for many, that means not spending the majority of their waking hours in a job that makes them feel miserable. The Tories and the Red Tories will blame people for not working, but they won’t address the fact that much of the work available today is simply not worth doing.
It’s a system that dehumanises workers and offers them little in return. A nation of "pee-packing machines" is not something to aspire to, yet that’s exactly what many jobs in this country have become.
But instead of attacking those who choose not to participate in this broken system, why don’t politicians in government start thinking about the real solution? If they truly cared about getting people back to work, they’d stop harping on about the evils of benefits and focus on what people actually need: better, more meaningful work.
That means shifting the economy away from low-skilled, monotonous jobs and investing in sectors where people can learn real, valuable skills. People should not have to go to university just to gain qualifications that matter.
There is an entire range of vocational qualifications that could provide workers with the tools they need to thrive in industries that actually offer something beyond a paycheck—a sense of accomplishment, growth, and pride.
Rather than perpetuating a toxic, blame-laden narrative that punishes the poor and downtrodden, politicians should be leading the charge on state-driven economic planning. They should create opportunities for skill-building, not just for the privileged few who can afford higher education, but for all.
The economy should be built to support people’s well-being and fulfillment, not just profits for the rich.
It’s time to stop demonising those who choose not to participate in an economy that offers so little, and instead, focus on building a future where people are empowered to engage in work that truly matters.
The government has the power to create a system that uplifts workers, offering them the training and resources to build fulfilling, high-skilled careers. Until that happens, they can keep their tired rhetoric about "laziness." But they can’t deny that they’re the ones who have failed, and are failing to provide the real opportunity for people to succeed.
The question isn’t why people don’t want to work. The real question is: why would anyone want to?
Comentários